Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background We previously showed that the endoscopic Kyoto classification for gastritis could predict Helicobacter pylori infection in individuals with a high negative titer of serum anti‐H pylori antibodies. This study evaluated H pylori infection and the Kyoto classification score in patients with a low negative titer (<3 U/ml), high negative titer (3–9.9 U/ml), low positive titer (10–49.9 U/ml), and high positive titer (≥50 U/ml). Methods Serum antibody levels, Kyoto classification score and histology were investigated in 870 individuals with no history of H pylori‐eradication therapy. Urea breath tests (UBTs) were additionally conducted for patients with a low negative titer and a Kyoto score ≥1 or an antibody titer ≥10 U/ml and a Kyoto score of 0 or 1. UBTs and/or histological studies were conducted for participants with a high negative titer. Results False diagnoses based on anti‐H pylori antibody titers were observed in 0.3% of the low‐negative‐titer group, 11.7% of the high‐negative‐titer group, 18.9% of the low‐positive‐titer group and 2.2% of the high‐positive‐titer group. Surprisingly, false diagnoses based on antibody titers were noted in 63.2% of patients with a low positive titer and a Kyoto score of 0 and in 62.5% of patients with a high negative titer and a Kyoto score ≥2, respectively. Conclusions Endoscopic findings could predict false diagnoses determined using serum antibody titers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishizawa et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: