Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To review ceritinib for the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). DATA SOURCES: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE (1974 to July week 5, 2014), and Google Scholar using the terms ceritinib, LDK378, and non-small-cell lung cancer. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: One phase 1 trial and 2 abstracts were identified. DATA SYNTHESIS: Ceritinib is approved for the treatment of ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC in patients who are intolerant to or have progressed despite therapy with crizotinib. In the phase 1 clinical trial, the maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 750 mg once daily. The overall response rate (ORR) was 58% (95% CI = 48-67) in patients who received ≥400 mg daily (n = 114). In this group, the ORR was 56% (95% CI = 41-67) and 62% (95% CI = 44-78) among crizotinib-exposed and -naïve patients, respectively. The ORR was 59% (95% CI = 47-70) in patients who received 750 mg daily (n = 78). The ORR was 56% (95% CI = 41-70) in crizotinib-treated patients and 64% (95% CI = 44-81) in crizotinib-naïve patients, respectively, in this subset. The median duration of response was 8.2 months. Median progression-free survival was 7.0 months. The most common adverse reactions included diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, anorexia, constipation, fatigue, and elevated transaminases. CONCLUSIONS: Ceritinib has activity in crizotinib-resistant and crizotinib-naïve patients and appears to be a viable alternative for ALK-positive NSCLC. Long-term data are needed to further define the role of ceritinib in the treatment of NSCLC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cooper et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: