Key result
DSA videodensitometry demonstrates a strong 0.93 correlation with the conventional area-length method for LV volumes.
Why the study?
The accuracy of densitometrically measured cardiac volume from digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images was unclear and required clarification.
Does videodensitometry of digital subtraction angiography accurately measure cardiac volume compared to standard methods?
Does videodensitometry of digital subtraction angiography accurately measure cardiac volume compared to standard methods?
Videodensitometry of digital subtraction angiography can accurately measure heart chamber volumes provided adequate gain settings and contrast concentrations are used.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports videodensitometry for LV volumetry; leaves open routine adoption pending larger validation studies.
In order to clarify an accuracy of densitometrically measured cardiac volume from the DSA image, experimental phantom study and clinical left ventriculography were performed. Good linear correlations were observed between volumes measured by videodensitometry of the DSA image and the real volumes of the phantoms in the experimental study and between left ventricular volumes determined by videodensitometry with DSA and measured by an area-length method in the clinical study, unless the obtained density was too high to get saturated or too low to be miss-counted. Therefore, adequate gain setting of the instrument and use of proper concentration of the contrast medium appeared to be essential in determining heart chamber volumes using DSA densitometry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Utsu et al. (1984) studied Various heart diseases (n=34). Videodensitometry of Digital Subtraction Angiography vs. Area-length method was evaluated on Correlation between left ventricular volumes determined by area-length method and by videodensitometry (r = 0.93, p=<0.001). Left ventricular volumes determined by videodensitometry of digital subtraction angiography showed a strong linear correlation (r=0.93, p<0.001) with those obtained by the conventional area-length method.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: