This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Waste disposal remains a contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, while waste-to-energy with carbon capture or gasification-based carbon recycling offers potential routes to carbon neutrality or even net carbon removal. Chemical looping can support both pathways: either through inherent CO 2 capture as a combustion process (CLC), or through generation of a nitrogen-free syngas as a gasification process (CLG). However, practical evaluation with real waste materials has remained limited to small scale. This study examines a plastic-rich waste-derived fuel at 1 MW th pilot scale with ilmenite as oxygen carrier, assessed from both CLC and CLG perspectives. Detailed analysis of the fuel-reactor off-gas, including heavy hydrocarbons, revealed only partial oxidation of volatiles and a consequently high residual combustible content with opposite implications for the two pathways. From a CLC perspective, while carbon capture related to waste-derived fuel was high, averaging 95 %, only about one third of the fuel carbon reached CO 2 , giving an oxygen demand near 60 %. However, comparison across pilots suggests that this is consistent with unfavorable operating conditions without a resolvable effect of scale itself. From a CLG perspective, the corresponding ∼70 % of fuel energy retained in the off-gas is favorable. However, less than 10 % was present as CO and H 2 , while methane, light olefins, and aromatics dominated, indicating a low yield of conventional syngas that appears fuel-intrinsic relative to biomass tested in the same plant. These results show that both pathways require further development, with route preferability linked to the policy and market framework.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohn et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: