Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Magnetic susceptibility, magnetic saturation, ligand field and EPR measurements are reported for the compounds Ni(5-methyl pyrazole) 4X2, (X = Cl, Br, I). All data are interpreted using ligand-field calculations, yielding parameters D q, D s, D t, B, C, g∥, g⊥,D, ζ∥, ζ⊥, and k. All data fit with a single set of parameters. The zero-field splittings and g values are determined from the magnetic measurements, whereas the excited state splittings are determined from the ligand-field spectra. In studying the relation between the zero-field splitting of the Ni(II) ion and both the spinorbit coupling and spectroscopic energy parameters, a description using an anisotropic spin-orbit coupling gave the most reliable fit. In addition, known ligand-field spectra and D values of Ni (pyrazole) 4X2, (X = Cl, Br, I) were considered. The derived energy parameters of the corresponding pyrazole and 5-methyl pyrazole compounds are very similar.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vermaas et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: