Molecular epidemiological analysis suggests cross-infection withPseudomonas aeruginosais rare in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis

To the Editor: In both cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF bronchiectasis (NCFBr) chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection is adversely prognostic [1, 2]. In CF, epidemic infections with specific clones of P. aeruginosa are associated with further adverse outcomes [3, 4]. This cross-infection risk has led to segregation of patients [5]. There are few data on P. aeruginosa cross-infection in NCFBr. As a result, segregation in NCFBr has not been addressed in guidelines [6]. Our aim was to undertake a cross-infection study in NCFBr. This was undertaken in an adult bronchiectasis service in the north-east of England (UK) that is separated from the regional CF unit (sited 2 miles (3 km) away). The service was initiated in 2007 with a weekly specialist clinic without a Pseudomonas -specific clinic. When NCFBr patients are hospitalised, there is a preference for cubicle-based (single-patient room) management, but when cubicles are unavailable, patients are managed in six-bed bays. All patients had computed tomographic confirmation and had predominantly idiopathic or post-infectious bronchiectasis with CF excluded following current guidelines [6]. The study had ethical permission and Caldicott approval (Newcastle and North Tyneside National Research Ethics Service Committee). 56 isolates were selected for analysis. Six were chosen from CF patients as laboratory controls. 50 were NCFBr isolates collected between 2008 and 2011 from …