Seventy-one persons (48 women, 23 men; mean age, 51.76 years) were evaluated for salivary flow rates and Candida albicans counts.Each person was seen on three different occasions.Samples of unstimulated whole, chewing-stimulated whole, acid-stimulated parotid, and candy-stimulated parotid saliva were collected under standardized conditions.An oral rinse was also obtained and evaluated for Candida albicans counts.Unstimulated and chewing-stimulated whole flow rates were negatively and significantly (p < 0.001) related to the Candida counts.Unstimulated whole saliva significantly (p < 0.05) differed in persons with Candida counts of 0 versus <500 versus ---500.Chewing-stimulated saliva was significantly (p < 0.05) different in persons with 0 counts compared with those with a ->500 count.Differences in stimulated parotid flow rates were not significant among different levels of Candida counts.The results of this study reveal that whole saliva is a better predictor than parotid saliva in identification of persons with high Candida albicans counts.(ORAt SURG ORAL MEO ORAL PATHOL ORAL RADIOL ENDOD 1995;80:284-8) Candidiasis is an opportunistic fungal infection most c o m m o n l y caused by the Candida species, Candida albicans.1 A p p r o x i m a t e l y 60% of healthy adults and 45% to 65% of healthy children m a y harbor commensal candidal microorganisms without demonstrating any clinical signs or symptoms of mucosal disease.Z, 3 Under a variety of pathologic conditions, Candida can proliferate in the mouth and produce oral This study was supported in part by NIH NCRR---01224-00040 (CAP Award).Part of this article was presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Oral Medicine in 1992.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Navazesh et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: