Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The last 7 years have seen a growing number of cost-effectiveness studies demonstrating that screening people for signs of depression and the subsequent provision of psychological therapy to prevent the onset of depressive disorder is a cost-effective intervention. Many of the studies have expressed outcomes generically, either as quality-adjusted life-years or disability-adjusted life-years, and reported results well below conventional thresholds of 'value for money.' However, such interventions are still not routinely delivered in many healthcare systems, suggesting a 'translational' gap between evidence and practice. Future research needs to better integrate comprehensive economic evaluation indices into study designs, such as broad assessment of costs and impacts, including non-health impacts, to gain an accurate insight into the broader economic benefits of such interventions. Furthermore, a focus on interventions aimed at children and adolescents, which can demonstrate impact into adulthood, are likely to be highly favourable, both clinically and economically.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mihalopoulos et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: