Key result
Improved automated binomial smoothing method yields reproducible analysis of myocardial backscatter cyclic variation.
Why the study?
Comparison of cyclic variation of myocardial backscatter results from different laboratories is difficult due to inconsistent analysis methods.
An improved automated method for analyzing the cyclic variation of myocardial backscatter enhances reproducibility and allows for better comparison of results across different laboratories.
May enhance reproducibility of backscatter analysis across labs; leaves open clinical utility pending larger studies.
The goal of myocardial tissue characterization is to augment information provided by two- and three-dimensional echocardiographic imaging, Doppler blood flow and speckle- or Doppler-derived tissue motion. Tissue characterization based on the systematic variation ofbackscattered ultrasound during the cardiac cycle ('cyclic variation') appears to be effective in characterizing both focal and diffuse myocardial pathologies. Unfortunately, comparison ofresults from different laboratories is difficult because of a lack of consistency among the several reported methods of analyzing the cyclic variation data. The goals of the present work are to present an improved method of analysis and to demonstrate that apparent disagreements are attributable primarily to the distinct approaches employed by different investigators. The improved automated method for determining the magnitude of cyclic variation utilizes binomial smoothing and an average deviation method and was validated using data acquired from 23 patients. This method illustrates a systematic means for resolving differences between laboratories. This resolution facilitates future comparisons between the cyclic variation of myocardial backscatter and measurements derived, for example, from strain-related approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lloyd et al. (2010) studied this question. Automated method utilizing binomial smoothing and an average deviation method was evaluated. An improved automated method utilizing binomial smoothing and an average deviation method was validated using data from 23 patients to analyze cyclic variation of myocardial backscatter.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: