Key result
Ticagrelor is linked to ~64% fewer gram-positive infections post-ACS versus clopidogrel.
Why the study?
The association between treatment with ticagrelor and subsequent risk for infection following acute coronary syndrome is increasingly important due to ticagrelor's antibacterial properties.
Does ticagrelor reduce the risk of hospital admissions due to gram-positive infections in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to clopidogrel?
Cohort (n=3,909)
No
Does ticagrelor reduce the risk of hospital admissions due to gram-positive infections in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to clopidogrel?
In patients with ACS, a DAPT regimen including ticagrelor is associated with a significantly reduced risk of hospital admission for gram-positive infections compared to clopidogrel.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports further study of ticagrelor’s potential anti-infective effects post-ACS; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
In light of recent studies describing the antibacterial properties of ticagrelor, the association between treatment with ticagrelor and subsequent risk for infection following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is taking on increased importance. A single center, retrospective, matched cohort analysis was performed. All patients older than 30 years of age admitted between January 1, 2013 and November 1, 2019 for an ACS and discharged with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were included. The primary outcome was defined as hospital admissions due to infections likely caused by gram-positive bacteria up to 1 year following the ACS hospitalization. The base cohort included 3,909 patients. About 2,035 (52.1%) were treated with ticagrelor and 1,874 (47.9%) with clopidogrel. Patients treated with ticagrelor had a 64% lower risk of gram-positive infection during the first year following hospitalization after adjusting for demographic and co-morbidity factors compared with those treated with clopidogrel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21 to 0.61; p <0.001). In a cohort starting from 1 year (conclusion of DAPT period) and up to 3 years following ACS hospitalization, the risk of gram-positive infection was comparable in both groups (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.19; p = 0.182). Treatment with ticagrelor was not associated with a reduced risk of gram-negative infections (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.06; p = 0.07). In conclusion, DAPT regimen that includes aspirin and ticagrelor is associated with reduced risk of gram-positive infection compared with the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lupu et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n=3,909). Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Hospital admissions due to infections likely caused by gram-positive bacteria up to 1 year following the ACS hospitalization (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.61, p=<0.001). Ticagrelor was associated with a 64% lower risk of gram-positive infection during the first year following ACS hospitalization compared with clopidogrel (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.61; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: