Key result
Childhood ADHD links to ~36 ms slower stop signal reaction times and altered fronto-striatal connectivity.
Why the study?
Emerging models of ADHD highlight disease-related changes in functional interactions within brain networks underlying motor inhibition, which remain to be characterized using resting state functional connectivity.
Does resting state functional connectivity correlate with inhibitory control differently in children with ADHD compared to typically developing controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=34)
No
Does resting state functional connectivity correlate with inhibitory control differently in children with ADHD compared to typically developing controls?
Resting state functional connectivity approaches can identify pathology-related differences in the neural circuits contributing to inhibitory control in children with ADHD.
Altered fronto-striatal rsFC may underlie inhibitory deficits in ADHD; leaves open biomarker utility pending prospective validation.
Motor inhibition is among the most commonly studied executive functions in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Imaging studies using probes of motor inhibition such as the stop signal task (SST) consistently demonstrate ADHD-related dysfunction within a right-hemisphere fronto-striatal network that includes inferior frontal gyrus and pre-supplementary motor area. Beyond findings of focal hypo- or hyper-function, emerging models of ADHD psychopathology highlight disease-related changes in functional interactions between network components. Resting state fMRI (R-fMRI) approaches have emerged as powerful tools for mapping such interactions (i.e., resting state functional connectivity, RSFC), and for relating behavioral and diagnostic variables to network properties. We used R-fMRI data collected from 17 typically developing controls (TDC) and 17 age-matched children with ADHD (aged 8-13 years) to identify neural correlates of SST performance measured outside the scanner. We examined two related inhibition indices: stop signal reaction time (SSRT), indexing inhibitory speed, and stop signal delay (SSD), indexing inhibitory success. Using 11 fronto-striatal seed regions-of-interest, we queried the brain for relationships between RSFC and each performance index, as well as for interactions with diagnostic status. Both SSRT and SSD exhibited connectivity-behavior relationships independent of diagnosis. At the same time, we found differential connectivity-behavior relationships in children with ADHD relative to TDC. Our results demonstrate the utility of RSFC approaches for assessing brain/behavior relationships, and for identifying pathology-related differences in the contributions of neural circuits to cognition and behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mennes et al. (2012) conducted a cross-sectional in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (n=34). Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder vs. Typically developing controls was evaluated on Stop signal reaction time (SSRT) (p=<0.03). Children with ADHD exhibited significantly slower stop signal reaction times (299.1 ms vs 263.2 ms) and showed differential fronto-striatal resting state functional connectivity related to inhibitory control compared to typically developing controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: