Key result
A 5-layer neural network detects strict LBBB on ECGs with ~89% accuracy.
Why the study?
An automatic algorithm to detect strict left bundle branch block on ECG and a method to test neural network detection consistency were needed.
A 5-layer neural network using random forest feature selection achieved high accuracy and consistency in automatically detecting strict LBBB on ECGs.
May aid automated ECG screening for strict LBBB; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Objective : To develop an automatic algorithm to detect strict left bundle branch block (LBBB) on electrocardiograms (ECG) and propose a procedure to test the consistency of neural network detections. Approach : The database for the classification of strict LBBB was provided by Telemetric and Holter ECG Warehouse. It contained 10 s ECGs taken from the MADIT-CRT clinical trial. The database was divided into a training dataset ( N = 300, strict LBBB = 174, non-strict LBBB = 126) and a test dataset ( N = 302, strict LBBB = 156, non-strict LBBB = 146). LBBB-related features were extracted by Philips DXL ™ algorithm, selected by a random forest classifier, and fed into a 5-layer neural network (NN) for the classification of strict LBBB on the training dataset. The performance of NN on the test dataset was compared to two random forest classifiers, an algorithm applying strict LBBB criteria, a wavelet-based approach, and a support-vector-machine approach. The consistency of NN’s detection was tested on 549 2 min recordings of the PTB diagnostic ECG database. LBBB annotations are not required to measure consistency. Main results : The performance of NN on the test dataset were sensitivity = 91. 7%, specificity = 85.6% and accuracy = 88.7% (PPV = 87.2%, NPV = 90.6%). The consistency score of strict-LBBB and non-strict-LBBB detection was 0.9341 and 0.9973 respectively. Conclusion : NN achieved the highest specificity, accuracy, and PPV. Using random forest for feature selection and NN for classification increased interpretability and reduced computational cost. The consistency test showed that NN achieved high consistency scores in the detection of strict LBBB. Significance : This work proposed an approach for selecting features and training NN for the detection of strict LBBB as well as a consistency test for black-box algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2020) studied Strict left bundle branch block (LBBB) (n=602). 5-layer neural network (NN) vs. Random forest classifiers, strict LBBB criteria algorithm, wavelet-based approach, and support-vector-machine approach was evaluated on Detection of strict LBBB (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy). A 5-layer neural network achieved 91.7% sensitivity, 85.6% specificity, and 88.7% accuracy in detecting strict left bundle branch block on ECGs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: