Key result
High social vulnerability index shows no association with urgent admission for TAVR.
Why the study?
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is not offered equitably to vulnerable populations, and the association between social vulnerability index and admission urgency for TAVR among insured patients was unclear.
Is social vulnerability index associated with admission urgency for TAVR among patients with commercial or Medicare insurance?
Observational
Yes
Is social vulnerability index associated with admission urgency for TAVR among patients with commercial or Medicare insurance?
Odds Ratio: 1.29 (95% CI 0.9–1.85)
Among commercial or Medicare beneficiaries undergoing TAVR, social vulnerability index was not associated with admission urgency, suggesting adequate insurance may mitigate socioeconomic disparities in this context.
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are not offered equitably to vulnerable population groups. Adequate levels of insurance may narrow gaps among patients with higher social vulnerability index (SVI). Among a national population of individuals with commercial or Medicare insurance, we sought to determine whether SVI was associated with urgency of receipt of TAVR for aortic stenosis. Methods and results: Using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (CDM), we identified admissions for TAVR with aortic stenosis between January 2018 and March 2022. Admission urgency was identified by CDM claims codes. SVI was cross-referenced to patient zip codes and grouped into quintiles. Generalized linear mixed effects models were used to predict the probability of a TAVR admission being urgent based on SVI quintiles, adjusting for patient and hospital-level covariates. Results: = 567) were classified as urgent. After adjusting for patient and hospital-level variables, there were no significant differences in the odds of urgent admission for TAVR according to SVI quintiles [OR 5th (greatest social vulnerability) vs 1st quintile (least social vulnerability): 1.29 (95 % CI: 0.90-1.85)]. Conclusions: Among commercial or Medicare beneficiaries with aortic stenosis, SVI was not associated with admission urgency for TAVR. To clarify whether cardiovascular care delivery is improved across SVI with higher paying beneficiaries, future investigation should identify whether relationships between SVI and TAVR urgency vary for Medicaid beneficiaries compared to commercial beneficiaries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bolakale‐Rufai et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Aortic stenosis. Social vulnerability index (5th quintile) vs. Social vulnerability index (1st quintile) was evaluated on Urgent admission for TAVR (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.90-1.85). Social vulnerability index (highest vs lowest quintile) was not significantly associated with urgent admission for TAVR among commercial or Medicare beneficiaries (OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.90-1.85).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: