A Comparison of INNOVANCE ® PFA P 2 Y and V erify N ow P 2 Y 12 Assay for the Assessment of Clopidogrel Resistance in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

INTRODUCTION: VerifyNow P2Y12 is commonly used to measure responsiveness to clopidogrel. We sought to compare the results obtained from novel INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y and VerifyNow P2Y12 assay to assess the clopidogrel resistance in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: A total of 255 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, preliminarily treated with 100 mg/day of aspirin followed by coadministration of clopidogrel (loading dose, 600 mg; maintenance dose, 75 mg/day), were enrolled in this study. Platelet aggregation was measured by INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y and VerifyNow P2Y12. RESULTS: INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y and VerifyNow P2Y12 assay showed moderate correlations with INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y vs. VerifyNow%inhibition: r = 0.412, P < 0.0001; INNOVANCE® PFA P2Yvs.VerifyNow P2Y12 reaction units (PRU): r = -0.402, P < 0.0001. The agreement between INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y and VerifyNow%inhibition was 85% and that of INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y and VerifyNow PRU was 79%. The k statistics between INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y and VerifyNow%inhibition and PRU were 0.52 and 0.44, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y in detecting clopidogrel resistance is comparable to that of VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. As the PFA-100® system is already widely used, the new test cartilage may be a useful tool for the assessment of clopidogrel effects. Additional clinical correlation studies are required to validate the effectiveness of INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y in predicting long-term clinical outcomes.