Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized double-blind trial shows acceptable tolerability and dose-proportional pharmacokinetics of tramadol in healthy adults, supporting subsequent cardiac repolarization studies.
This randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group multiple‐ascending‐dose study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of tramadol hydrochloride in healthy adults to inform dosage and design for a subsequent QT/QTc study. Healthy men and women, 18 to 45 years old (inclusive), were sequentially assigned to the tramadol 200, 400, or 600 mg/day treatment cohort and within each cohort, randomized (4:1) to either tramadol or placebo every 6 hours for 9 oral doses. Of the 24 participants randomized to tramadol (n = 8/cohort), 22 (91.7%) completed the study. The AUCtau,ss of tramadol increased approximately 2.2‐ and 3.6‐fold for the (+) enantiomer and 2.0‐ and 3.5‐fold for the (‐) enantiomer with increasing dose from 200 to 400 and 600 mg/day, whereas the Cmax,ss increased 2.1‐ and 3.3‐fold for the (+) enantiomer and 2.0‐ and 3.2‐fold for the (‐) enantiomer. Overall, 21 participants (87.5%) participants reported ≥1 treatment‐emergent adverse event; most frequent were nausea (17 of 24, 70.8%) and vomiting (7 of 24, 29.2%). Vomiting (affected participants and events) increased with increasing dose from 200 to 600 mg/day but was mild (5 of 24) or moderate (2 of 24) in severity. All tested dosage regimens of tramadol showed acceptable safety and tolerability profile for further investigation in a thorough QT/QTc study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DeLemos et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: