Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The differential response of the two commonly used measures of light penetration in water, Secchi disc transparency (SD,m) and the attenuation coefficient for downwelling irradiance (Kd,m-1), to the light attenuating processes of absorption and scattering is described. It is demonstrated that the commonly invoked constancy in the product Kd⋅SD should only be expected when the relative contributions of scattering and absorption to Kd remains uniform. A number of scenarios and documented phenomena are presented for which preferential effects on scattering or absorption, and therefore variable values of Kd⋅SD, are expected. Measurement errors also contribute to variability in Kd⋅SD, particularly at low (<1.5m)SD values. Paired observations of Kd and SD presented from four different systems, representing a wide range of Kd and SD values, demonstrate the variability of the magnitude of Kd⋅SD within individual systems. Secchi disc transparency is probably not a reliable indicator of Kd in many systems. It is recommended that the uncertainty associated with invoking the constancy of Kd⋅SD in various ecological modeling efforts, in which Kd measurements are missing or are temporally limited, be accommodated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steve W. Effler (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: