Key result
Administrative and clinical data sources offer evolving tools and innovative analytic techniques for cardiac surgery research, driven by regulatory and value-based care requirements.
Discusses the utility and selection of administrative and clinical data sources for cardiac surgery research.
“Don't use a screwdriver to pound a nail. It takes forever and wrecks the screwdriver.”1 This is a colloquial adaptation of Abraham Maslow's statement, “If your only tool is a hammer, every problem becomes a nail.”2 Tools for clinical research are evolving, including both eclectic information sources (data) and innovative analytic techniques. This is driven in part by regulatory bodies and third-party payers requiring healthcare personnel and hospitals to document the quality of care delivered. Value-based care paradigms often require quality metrics be met for reimbursement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karamlou et al. (2020) conducted a review in cardiac surgery research. Administrative and clinical data sources offer evolving tools and innovative analytic techniques for cardiac surgery research, driven by regulatory and value-based care requirements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: