Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case series demonstrates safe bone expansion using resorbable devices in pediatric craniofacial patients, indicating that secondary hardware removal surgery can be avoided.
We report on the use of a new type of internal bone distraction devices designed for craniofacial applications. These resorbable devices allow a single operative procedure for device placement, eliminating the need for a second open operative procedure for hardware removal. We report on three models of resorbable devices. The midface orbital frontal device was used for midface and monoblock advancement. The mandibular adolescent device was used in older children and adolescents. In neonates and young children, the mandibular infant device was used. Twenty-one patients (9 female, 12 male) aged 6 days to 15 years (mean = 53 months) underwent bony expansion of the craniofacial skeleton over a 2-year period. A total of 39 devices were implanted: 32 in the mandible, 3 in the maxilla alone, and 4 in the maxilla and frontal bones. Expansion distances ranged from 15 to 30 mm. Expansion took place at 1 to 2 mm/d. Latency periods ranged from 48 to 72 hours. There were no device structural failures and no major complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burstein et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: