Key result
Treadmill-only exercise improves pain-free walking distance by 44 meters but fails to improve endothelial function.
Why the study?
The impact of supervised exercise training on endothelial function in patients with intermittent claudication is unclear.
Does treadmill-only or combined supervised exercise training improve endothelial function and walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication?
RCT (n=35)
Does treadmill-only or combined supervised exercise training improve endothelial function and walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supervised exercise training, whether treadmill-only or combined with resistance training, does not improve endothelial function in patients with intermittent claudication, despite improvements in walking distance with treadmill training.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The impact of supervised exercise training on endothelial function in patients with intermittent claudication is unclear. This study assesses the impact of treadmill-based supervised exercise training alone or in combination with resistance training on pain free walking distance, flow-mediated dilatation, reactive hyperaemia index, nitric oxide and asymmetric dimethylarginine. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with intermittent claudication were randomised to 12 weeks of treadmill-only supervised exercise training (Group 1) or a combination of treadmill and lower-limb resistance supervised exercise training (Group 2). Pain free walking distance was assessed by six-minute walk test. Endothelial function was assessed by brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation, reactive hyperaemia index and serum analysis of asymmetric dimethylarginine and nitric oxide. RESULTS: Pain free walking distance improved within Group 1 (160 m to 204 m, p = 0.03) but not Group 2 (181 m to 188 m, p = 0.82), no between group difference. No significant change in flow-mediated dilatation or reactive hyperaemia index in either group. Nitric oxide decreased in Group 1 (15.0 µmol/L to 8.3 µmol/L, p = 0.003) but not Group 2 (11.2 µmol/L to 9.1 µmol/L, p = 0.14), p = 0.07 between groups. Asymmetric dimethylarginine decreased in Group 2 (0.61 µmol/L to 0.56 µmol/L, p = 0.03) but not Group 1 (0.58 µmol/l to 0.58 µmol/L, p = 0.776), no between group difference. CONCLUSION: Supervised exercise training does not improve endothelial function as measured by flow-mediated dilatation, reactive hyperaemia index and nitric oxide bioavailability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delaney et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Intermittent claudication (n=35). Treadmill-only supervised exercise training vs. Combination of treadmill and lower-limb resistance supervised exercise training was evaluated on Pain free walking distance and endothelial function (flow-mediated dilatation, reactive hyperaemia index, nitric oxide, asymmetric dimethylarginine). Treadmill-only supervised exercise training improved pain-free walking distance (160 m to 204 m, p=0.03) but neither regimen significantly improved endothelial function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: