Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the usefulness of serum chromogranin A (CgA) for the prediction of tumor burden, therapeutic response, and nomogram-based survival in well-moderate nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) with liver metastases (LMs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 51 NF-PNETs of LMs patients, 134 other neuroendocrine tumors, and 125 controls. Serum CgA levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at baseline and after treatment. LMs tumor burden was computed simultaneously from computed tomography/MRI scan with thin slices using a semiquantitative three-dimensional reconstruction approach. Predictive CgA for therapeutic response was assessed using the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria. A nomogram to predict the prognostic value of CgA with variables selected in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was constructed; the accuracy of the nomogram was quantified by the (concordance index) C-index and a calibration plot. RESULTS: Considering NF-PNETs, CgA correlated with the tumor grade and differentiation (P<0.05). There was a nonlinear exponential regression between LMs tumor burden and CgA levels (P<0.001). The alteration in CgA correlated with therapeutic response (P<0.001). Increased CgA presented significantly lower progression-free survival than the stable/decreased CgA subgroup (P<0.001). For overall survival, a baseline CgA increase greater than 2.5 upper limit of normal level was predictive of a poor prognosis (P<0.001). Baseline CgA level, LMs tumor burden, and Ki-67 were selected as independent factors for the nomogram to predict overall survival; the nomogram showed fitting calibration with a C-index of 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.92). CONCLUSION: Serum CgA could be used to reflect tumor burden, evaluate the therapeutic response, and predict the survival outcomes for NF-PNETs with LMs. An effective nomogram including CgA was proposed for prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: