Key result
High ML-assessed abdominal aortic calcification linked to ~60% greater risk of fall-associated hospitalizations.
Why the study?
Abdominal aortic calcification scoring requires trained experts and is time-consuming, limiting its clinical incorporation despite its association with falls risk.
Does a higher machine learning-derived abdominal aortic calcification score predict incident fall-associated hospitalizations in individuals undergoing bone mineral density screening?
Cohort (n=8,565)
Does a higher machine learning-derived abdominal aortic calcification score predict incident fall-associated hospitalizations in individuals undergoing bone mineral density screening?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automated machine learning scoring of abdominal aortic calcification on routine DXA images can opportunistically identify patients at high risk for fall-associated hospitalizations.
Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC), a subclinical measure of cardiovascular disease (CVD) that can be assessed on vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) images during osteoporosis screening, is reported to be a falls risk factor. A limitation to incorporating AAC clinically is that its scoring requires trained experts and is time-consuming. We examined if our machine learning (ML) algorithm for AAC (ML-AAC24) is associated with a higher fall-associated hospitalisation risk in the Manitoba Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Registry. A total of 8565 individuals (94.0% female, age 75.7 ± 6.8 years) who had a BMD and VFA image from DXA between February 2010 and December 2017 were included. ML-AAC24 was categorised based on established categories (ML-AAC24 = low < 2; moderate 2 to < 6; high ≥ 6). Cox proportional hazards models assessed the relationship between ML-AAC24 categories and incident fall-associated hospitalisations obtained from linked health records (mean ± SD follow-up, 3.9 ± 2.2 years). Individuals with moderate (9.6%) and high ML-AAC24 (11.7%) had a greater proportion of fall-associated hospitalisations, compared to those with low ML-AAC24 (6.0%). In age and sex-adjusted models, compared to low ML-AAC24, moderate (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.24-1.79) and high ML-AAC24 (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.56-2.28) were associated with greater hazards for a fall-associated hospitalisation. Results were comparable (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.13-1.65 and HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.31-1.95, respectively) after multivariable adjustment, including prior falls and CVD, as well as medication use. Integrating ML-AAC24 into bone density machine software to identify high risk individuals would opportunistically provide important information on fall and cardiovascular disease risk to clinicians for evaluation and intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sim et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Abdominal aortic calcification (n=8,565). High machine learning-assessed abdominal aortic calcification (ML-AAC24 ≥ 6) vs. Low ML-AAC24 (< 2) was evaluated on Incident fall-associated hospitalisations (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.31-1.95). High machine learning-assessed abdominal aortic calcification was associated with an increased risk of fall-associated hospitalizations compared to low calcification (HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.31-1.95).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: