Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The review by Sonuga-Barke and colleagues offers a thoughtful and wide-ranging appraisal of the current state of ADHD research, while also looking into the future to consider unresolved questions and critical next steps. Furthermore, it grapples with the tension between the need to define a coherent conceptualisation of ADHD for clinical and research purposes, while keeping an open mind to new research that challenges current consensus. In our commentary, we consider several cross-cutting ideas discussed in Sonuga-Barke et al., including the heterogeneous nature of ADHD, ensuring equity of translational research, and the importance of participatory research to support equitable and acceptable clinical practices for all individuals with ADHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agnew‐Blais et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: