We show that recursively generated Chebyshev expansions offer numerically efficient representations for calculating zero-temperature spectral functions of one-dimensional lattice models using matrix product state (MPS) methods. The main features of this Chebyshev matrix product state (CheMPS) approach are as follows: (i) it achieves uniform resolution over the spectral function's entire spectral width; (ii) it can exploit the fact that the latter can be much smaller than the model's many-body bandwidth; (iii) it offers a well-controlled broadening scheme that allows finite-size effects to be either resolved or smeared out, as desired; (iv) it is based on using MPS tools to recursively calculate a succession of Chebyshev vectors |tₙ, (v) the entanglement entropies of which were found to remain bounded with increasing recursion order n for all cases analyzed here; and (vi) it distributes the total entanglement entropy that accumulates with increasing n over the set of Chebyshev vectors |tₙ, which need not be combined into a single vector. In this way, the growth in entanglement entropy that usually limits density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) approaches is packaged into conveniently manageable units. We present zero-temperature CheMPS results for the structure factor of spin-1/2 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg chains and perform a detailed finite-size analysis. Making comparisons to three benchmark methods, we find that CheMPS (a) yields results comparable in quality to those of correction-vector DMRG, at dramatically reduced numerical cost; (b) agrees well with Bethe ansatz results for an infinite system, within the limitations expected for numerics on finite systems; and (c) can also be applied in the time domain, where it has potential to serve as a viable alternative to time-dependent DMRG (in particular, at finite temperatures). Finally, we present a detailed error analysis of CheMPS for the case of the noninteracting resonant level model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holzner et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: