Key result
FISH aids soft tissue neoplasm diagnosis by assessing characteristic translocations or gene amplifications.
Why the study?
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is used to assess characteristic genetic alterations in soft tissue neoplasms to assist in their diagnosis, but a comprehensive overview of its role and evaluation methods is needed.
FISH is a useful technique for diagnosing various soft tissue neoplasms by identifying characteristic translocations or gene amplifications.
Supports FISH integration into soft tissue tumor diagnostics; leaves open needs for assay standardization and prospective validation.
This paper presents an overview of the role of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the diagnosis of soft tissue neoplasms. Many soft tissue neoplasms harbor characteristic translocations or amplification of gene regions, which can be assessed by FISH, and can be used to assist in their diagnosis. We discuss the major morphologic categories in which FISH has come to be used including high-grade round cell sarcomas, spindle cell sarcomas, low-grade myxoid neoplasms, adipocytic neoplasms, and malignant melanocytic neoplasms on the basis of a recent review of soft tissue neoplasms which were analyzed by FISH. We also review the molecular alterations (translocations and amplification of gene regions), which have come to define many of these diagnostic entities and the most effective way to evaluate them with FISH with attention to potential pitfalls. Finally, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of FISH as a technique when appraising soft tissue neoplasms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanas et al. (2009) conducted a review in Soft tissue neoplasms. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was evaluated. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a valuable technique for assessing characteristic translocations or gene amplifications to assist in the diagnosis of various soft tissue neoplasms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: