Key result
Eccentric LVH is linked to ~115% higher risk of sudden cardiac arrest when LVEF ≤40%.
Why the study?
The relationship between left ventricular geometric patterns and risk of sudden cardiac arrest in patients with severely reduced ejection fraction in the general population had not been evaluated.
Does eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy increase the risk of sudden cardiac arrest in patients with LVEF ≤40%?
Case-Control (n=246)
Does eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy increase the risk of sudden cardiac arrest in patients with LVEF ≤40%?
Odds Ratio: 2.15 (95% CI 1.08–4.29)
Absolute Event Rate: 40.7% vs 25.7%
p-value: p=0.03
Eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy is independently associated with a twofold increased risk of sudden cardiac arrest in patients with LVEF ≤40%, suggesting a role for echocardiographic LV geometry in SCA risk stratification.
May support LV geometry in SCA risk models for LVEF ≤40%; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Recent reports indicate that specific left ventricular (LV) geometric patterns predict recurrent ventricular arrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, this relationship has not been evaluated among patients at risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in the general population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Adult SCA cases from the Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study were compared with geographic controls with no prior history of SCA. Archived echocardiograms performed closest and prior to the SCA event were reviewed. LV geometry was defined as normal (normal LV mass index [LVMI] and relative wall thickness [RWT]), concentric remodeling (normal LVMI and increased RWT), concentric hypertrophy (increased LVMI and RWT), or eccentric hypertrophy (increased LVMI and normal RWT). Analysis was restricted to those with LVEF ≤40%. A total of 246 subjects were included in the analysis. SCA cases (n=172, 68.6±13.3 years, 78% male), compared to controls (n=74, 66.8±12.1 years, 73% male), had lower LVEF (29.4±7.9% vs 30.8±6.3%, P=0.021). Fewer cases presented with normal LV geometry (30.2% vs 43.2%, P=0.048) and more with eccentric hypertrophy (40.7% vs 25.7%, P=0.025). In a multivariate model, eccentric hypertrophy was independently predictive of SCA (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.08-4.29, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Eccentric LV hypertrophy was independently associated with increased risk of SCA in subjects with EF ≤40%. These findings, now consistent between device-implanted and non-implanted populations, indicate the potential of improving SCA risk stratification from the same noninvasive echocardiogram at no additional cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phan et al. (2016) conducted a case-control in Sudden cardiac arrest with severely reduced ejection fraction (n=246). Eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy vs. Normal left ventricular geometry was evaluated on Sudden cardiac arrest (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.08-4.29, p=0.03). Eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy was independently associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac arrest in patients with LVEF ≤40% (OR 2.15; 95% CI 1.08-4.29; P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: