Key result
Smartphone screening tests for increased detection of subclinical AF versus routine care.
Why the study?
The efficacy of a fully scalable e-health-based strategy for detection of subclinical atrial fibrillation compared with routine symptom-based screening was unknown.
Does an e-health-based screening strategy using smartphones improve the detection of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation leading to oral anticoagulation compared to routine symptom-based screening in an at-risk population?
RCT (n=4,400)
Open-label
cross-over
Does an e-health-based screening strategy using smartphones improve the detection of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation leading to oral anticoagulation compared to routine symptom-based screening in an at-risk population?
This paper describes the rationale and design of a digital, siteless, randomized cross-over trial evaluating whether a smartphone-based PPG screening strategy increases the detection of clinically actionable atrial fibrillation compared to routine care.
eBRAVE-AF will test smartphone PPG screening versus routine care for subclinical AF detection; results may extend evidence on digital strategies in at-risk populations.
Current guidelines recommend opportunistic screening for subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF) taking advantage of e-health-based technologies. However, the efficacy of a fully scalable e-health-based strategy for AF detection in a head-to-head comparison with routine symptom-based screening is unknown. eBRAVE-AF is an investigator-initiated, digital, prospective, randomized, siteless, open-label, cross-over study to evaluate an e-health-based strategy for detection of AF in a real-world setting. 67,488 policyholders of a large German health insurance company (Versicherungskammer Bayern, Germany) selected by age ≥ 50 years and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 1 (females ≥2) are invited to participate. Subjects with known AF or on treatment with oral anticoagulation are excluded. After obtaining electronic informed consent, at least 4,400 participants will be randomly assigned to an e-health-based screening strategy or routine symptom-based screening. The e-health-based strategy consists of repetitive one-minute photoplethysmographic (PPG) pulse wave assessments using a certified smartphone app (Preventicus Heartbeats, Preventicus, Jena, Germany), followed by a confirmatory 14-day ECG patch (CardioMem CM 100 XT, Getemed, Teltow, Germany) in case of abnormal findings. After 6 months, participants are crossed over to the other study arm. Primary endpoint is the incidence of newly diagnosed AF leading to oral anticoagulation indicated by an independent physician. Clinical follow-up will be at least 12 months. In both groups, follow-up is performed by 4-week app-based questionnaires, personal contact in case of abnormal findings, and matching with claim-based insurance data and medical reports. At time of writing enrollment is completed. First results are expected to be available in mid-2021.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freyer et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in subclinical atrial fibrillation (n=4,400). e-health-based screening strategy (smartphone PPG and ECG patch) vs. routine symptom-based screening was evaluated on incidence of newly diagnosed AF leading to oral anticoagulation indicated by an independent physician. The eBRAVE-AF trial is designed to evaluate whether an e-health-based smartphone screening strategy increases the detection of subclinical atrial fibrillation compared to routine screening.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: