Key result
Excimer laser coronary angioplasty significantly improved myocardial reperfusion compared to manual aspiration in patients with acute coronary syndrome, achieving TIMI 3 flow in 86.0% versus 68.8% of patients.
Why the study?
Mechanical reperfusion is superior to thrombolytic therapy in ACS, but the effectiveness of excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) for thrombus vaporization before stenting needed evaluation.
Does Excimer laser coronary angioplasty improve myocardial reperfusion and clinical outcomes compared to manual aspiration in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Cohort (n=98)
No
Does Excimer laser coronary angioplasty improve myocardial reperfusion and clinical outcomes compared to manual aspiration in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Absolute Event Rate: 86% vs 68.8%
p-value: p=0.04
Excimer laser coronary angioplasty before stenting in ACS improves tissue-level myocardial reperfusion and lesion crossability compared to manual aspiration.
May support excimer laser use for reperfusion in ACS; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Mechanical reperfusion has proven to be an unquestionably superior treatment strategy over that of thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) is a unique revascularization device that has a lytic effect on thrombus, in addition to its debulking effect on the atherosclerotic plaque beneath the thrombus. METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-center retrospective analysis consisted of consecutive ACS patients treated with ELCA (n=50) and age- and sex-matched ACS patients treated with manual aspiration (n=48) without use of a distal protection device. Success rate was judged by lesion crossability, procedure complications, and significant reduction of stenosis. Tissue-level perfusion was assessed on antegrade Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade, myocardial blush grade (MBG), and ST-segment elevation resolution (STR). Short-term outcome was evaluated according to occurrence of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE; myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, coronary artery bypass graft, and death). Lesion crossability was higher in the ELCA group than in the aspiration group (96.2% vs. 82.6%, P=0.04). Attainment of TIMI 3 flow (86.0% vs. 68.8%, P=0.04) and MBG 3 (76.0% vs. 54.2%, P=0.02) was also higher in the ELCA group than in the aspiration group. Complete STR was similar between the 2 groups. In-hospital MACE were significantly more frequent in the aspiration group. CONCLUSIONS: ELCA is feasible, safe, and effective for the treatment of patients with ACS and appears to be useful as an adjunctive lesion preparation device.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shishikura et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=98). Excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) vs. Manual thrombus aspiration was evaluated on Attainment of TIMI 3 flow on final angiogram (p=0.04). Excimer laser coronary angioplasty significantly improved myocardial reperfusion compared to manual aspiration in patients with acute coronary syndrome, achieving TIMI 3 flow in 86.0% versus 68.8% of patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: