Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary Oilseed‐derived biochar, a by‐product of pyrolysis for biodiesel production, is richer in aliphatic compounds than the commonly studied wood‐derived biochar, affecting both its mineralization in soil and its interaction with native soil organic carbon ( nSOC ). Here, we investigated the soil C sequestration potential of three different oilseed biochars derived from C 3 plant material: soyabean, castor bean and jatropha cake. The chemical composition of these biochars was determined by elemental analysis ( CHN ) and 13 C NMR spectroscopy. The cumulative CO 2 efflux from 30‐day laboratory incubations of biochar mixed with a sandy soil containing nSOC from C 4 plants was measured as a proxy for mineralization rate. The relative contribution of each source to CO 2 production was calculated based on the 13 C ‐signatures of total CO 2 efflux and the source materials (soil and biochars). Our results showed that: (i) castor bean biochar contained relatively large amounts of aliphatic compounds, resulting in a greater mineralization rate than soyabean and jatropha biochars; (ii) CO 2 efflux from the soil‐biochar mixtures originated mostly from the biochars, suggesting that these biochars contain rapidly decomposable compounds; and (iii) all three oilseed biochars decelerated nSOC mineralization. This negative priming effect appeared to be caused by different factors. We conclude that oilseed biochars have the potential to increase soil C stocks directly and increase soil C sequestration indirectly in the short term through negative priming of nSOC mineralization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rittl et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: