Key result
Isolated tricuspid valve surgery after left heart disease shows similar MACCE rates versus post-congenital surgery.
Why the study?
Left heart involvement may influence the physiopathology and prognosis of severe tricuspid regurgitation after cardiac surgery, but comparative outcomes after isolated tricuspid valve surgery are unclear.
Does isolated tricuspid valve surgery for severe tricuspid regurgitation yield different outcomes in patients with prior left heart disease surgery compared to prior congenital heart disease surgery?
Cohort (n=58)
No
Does isolated tricuspid valve surgery for severe tricuspid regurgitation yield different outcomes in patients with prior left heart disease surgery compared to prior congenital heart disease surgery?
Isolated tricuspid valve surgery can be safely performed with comparable mid-term outcomes in patients with prior left heart disease surgery versus prior congenital heart disease surgery, despite higher baseline surgical risk in the former.
Background: Left heart involvement might be a differential factor in the physiopathology and prognosis of severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) following cardiac surgery. We aimed to compare the outcomes of isolated tricuspid valve surgery (ITVS) after congenital versus left heart-disease surgery. Methods: We retrospectively studied and followed up 58 patients who underwent ITVS for TR following cardiac surgery in our center from January 2012 to December 2017. According to the different etiologies of TR, the participants were divided into one group of TR following surgery for congenital heart diseases (CHD) (pCHD group, n=24), and another group of TR following surgery for left heart disease (pVHD group, n=34). Results: Compared to the pCHD group, the pVHD group presented with a more advanced age (P<0.001), higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score calculation (P=0.04), and higher EuroSCORE II calculation (P=0.01). In the post-operative course, the pVHD group showed a longer mechanical ventilation time (P<0.001) and longer intensive care unit stay (P=0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in in-hospital mortality (8.8% vs. 0, P=0.26), or the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (20.6% vs. 12.5%, P=0.47) at follow-up. Conclusions: Severe TR following surgery for left heart disease is associated with higher surgical risks and a remarkable frailty as compared to that following surgery for CHDs; however, with the development of surgical techniques and peri-operative management, ITVS can be safely performed in both conditions with promising contemporary mid-term outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Severe tricuspid regurgitation following cardiac surgery (n=58). Prior surgery for left heart disease vs. Prior surgery for congenital heart disease was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at follow-up (p=0.47). Isolated tricuspid valve surgery after left heart disease surgery showed similar mid-term MACCE rates compared to surgery after congenital heart disease (20.6% vs 12.5%, P=0.47).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: