Several silylated derivatives of poly(methylphenylphosphazene) [Me(Ph)PN] x [RMe 2 SiCH 2 (Ph)PN] y [R = CH 3, 3; (CH 2 ) 2 CH 3, 4; (CH 2 ) 2 CF 3, 5; and (CH 2 ) 2 (CF 2 ) 8 F, 6 ] were prepared via deprotonation of the methyl group of [Ph(Me)PN] n with n -BuLi followed by the treatment with chlorosilanes. Three new terpolymers, [Me(Ph)PN] x [Me 3 SiCH 2 (Ph)PN] y [RMe 2 SiCH 2 (Ph)PN] z [R = (CH 2 ) 2 (CF 2 ) 8 F; x = 0.44, y = 0.14, z = 0.42, 7; x = 0.46, y = 0.27, z = 0.27, 8; x = 0.33, y = 0.54, z = 0.13, 9 ], were also prepared via cosubstitution using varying ratios of Me 3 SiCl and RMe 2 SiCl. Structural characterization and purity of each of these polymers were established by 1 H and 31 P NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, and differential scanning calorimetry. The gas permeabilities of membranes of these polymers were determined at 35 °C and compared to that of the parent polymer [Me(Ph)PN] n, 1, for which permeabilities to N 2, O 2, CH 4, and CO 2 were 0.6 × 10 -10, 1.8 × 10 -10, 0.7 × 10 -10, and 6.5 × 10 -10 cm 3 (STP)·cm -1 ·cmHg -1 ·s -1, respectively. The incorporation of the silyl groups generally increased permeabilities relative to [Me(Ph)PN] n without significant changes in selectivity. Polymers from the cosubstitution reactions had as much as a 15-fold increase in gas permeabilities with selectivity ratios (e.g., α CO 2 /CH 4 = 8.9) similar to those of 1 . The trimethylsilyl groups also increased the T g values of the terpolymers 7 − 9 relative to the simple derivative 6 . The gas permeation properties of these polymers are discussed with respect to the lengths and concentration of the side groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wisian‐Neilson et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: