Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study analyzed the quality properties of chicken breast tteokgalbi with D-allulose and sprout-barley (C+: sugar 3%; C–: D-allulose 3%; SB-1: D-allulose 3%, sprout-barley 1%; SB-2: D-allulose 3%, sprout-barley 2%; SB-3: D-allulose 3%, sprout-barley 3%). Quality properties were including proximate composition, pH, color, cooking yield, texture profile analysis (TPA), and calories. The moisture content of SB-3 was significantly higher than C– (p<0.05). The protein content of C– was significantly higher than SB-3. Before and after cooked pH of samples containing D-allulose were significantly lower than C + (p<0.05). Uncooked and cooked lightness and redness of samples containing sprout-barley powder were decrease tendency with increasing sprout-barley powder (p<0.05). Uncooked and cooked yellowness of samples containing sprout-barley powder were significantly higher than C+, C– (p<0.05). Cooking yield of samples containing sprout-barley powder were significantly higher than controls (p<0.05). Calorie of samples containing D-allulose were significantly lower than C+ (p<0.05). Thus, these results show that suitable adding contents of sprout-barley powder for chicken breast tteokgalbi is 3% and adding D-allulose as sugar substitute on meat products has lower calorific value than adding sugar.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: