This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study evaluated the influence of tenderness, intramuscular fat (IMF), and the metabolomic profile on the sensory quality of Nellore beef. Longissimus thoracis samples (n = 280) were analyzed for Warner−Bratzler shear force (WBSF), IMF, color, pH, cooking loss, and water retention. Four contrasting groups (n = 15) were formed: −WBSF−IMF (6.21 ± 0.14 kg; 0.76 ± 0.03%), +WBSF+IMF (8.26 ± 0.17 kg; 2.35 ± 0.15%), −WBSF+IMF (5.68 ± 0.18 kg; 2.54 ± 0.15%), and +WBSF−IMF (8.41 ± 0.1 kg; 0.85 ± 0.08%). Metabolomic profiles were assessed by NMR spectroscopy. Consumer evaluations indicated that −WBSF− IMF samples achieved the highest palatability scores, associated with elevated acetyl-carnitine, while +WBSF−IMF showed higher inosine-5′-monophosphate. Enriched metabolic pathways distinguished groups, particularly fatty acid, amino acid, and nucleotide metabolism. Overall, tenderness, IMF, and metabolites shaped consumer preference: tender, lean beef scored highest, whereas tougher, high-IMF beef ranked second and was characterized by glutamate, creatinine, malonate, acetate, betaine, and leucine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodrigues et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: