Key result
Inhaled iloprost linked to better clinical response and less hypotension than oral sildenafil in PPHN.
Why the study?
The effectiveness and safety of oral sildenafil and inhaled iloprost in term newborns with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn were examined.
Does inhaled iloprost improve clinical response and safety compared to oral sildenafil in term newborns with persistent pulmonary hypertension?
Cohort (n=47)
Does inhaled iloprost improve clinical response and safety compared to oral sildenafil in term newborns with persistent pulmonary hypertension?
Inhaled iloprost appears to be a safer and more effective treatment than oral sildenafil for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn, particularly due to the avoidance of systemic hypotension.
May support inhaled iloprost preference in neonatal PPHN; hypothesis-generating and requires RCTs before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to examine the effectiveness and safety of oral sildenafil and inhaled iloprost in term newborns with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Oral sildenafil and inhaled iloprost were administered to 27 and 20 neonates, respectively, for treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension. All patients were term infants at 37 gestational weeks or older. In the sildenafil group, 14 patients had meconium aspiration syndrome, 8 had asphyxia (hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy stages II and III), 3 had congenital pneumonia, 1 had transient tachypnea, and 1 had idiopathic PPHN. In the iloprost group, 9 patients had meconium aspiration syndrome, 7 had asphyxia (hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy stages II and III), 3 had congenital pneumonia, and 1 had transient tachypnea. Sildenafil citrate was administered via an oral feeding tube. Iloprost was administered endotracheally to patients on mechanical ventilation using a jet nebulizer. RESULTS: Iloprost appeared to be more effective than sildenafil in the treatment of PPHN with regard to time to adequate clinical response, ventilatory parameters, duration of drug administration, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of return to normal values of respiratory failure indices, use of MgSO4 as a second vasodilator and requirement for support with inotropic agents. We observed no side effects on blood pressure or homeostasis in any of the patients in the iloprost group. Systemic hypotension was significantly elevated in the sildenafil group. Four and three infants died of PPHN in the sildenafil and iloprost groups, respectively. Pulmonary systolic arterial pressure decreased to normal levels in the remaining 40 patients, and they were discharged from hospital. CONCLUSION: We suggested that inhaled iloprost may be a safe and effective treatment choice in newborn infants with persistent pulmonary hypertension. In cases where treatment with inhaled iloprost, ECMO or INO is not possible, oral sildenafil can be an alternative therapy option in the treatment of PPHN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kahveci et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) (n=47). Inhaled iloprost vs. Oral sildenafil was evaluated on Clinical response, ventilatory parameters, and safety. Inhaled iloprost improved clinical response and ventilatory parameters compared to oral sildenafil in neonates with PPHN, with less hypotension and similar mortality (15.0% vs 14.8%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: