In responding to Taede Smedes, I first examine his thesis that the recent dialogue between science and religion has been dominated by scientism and does not take theology seriously. I then consider his views on divine action, free will and determinism, and process philosophy. Finally I use the fourfold typology of Conflict, Independence, Dialogue, and Integration to discuss his proposal for the future of science and religion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ian G. Barbour (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: