Why the study?
Speed is not an appropriate parameter for classifying intensity in team sport activity with continual changes in speed and direction, and the efficacy of critical metabolic power derived from variable-speed movement for this purpose needed assessment.
Observational (n=12)
Critical metabolic power derived from variable-speed activity is a more appropriate parameter than speed for classifying intensity in team sports with continual changes in speed and direction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critical metabolic power may better reflect high-intensity match demands; leaves open its superiority for training prescription pending prospective validation.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of critical metabolic power derived from variable-speed movement for classifying intensity in team sport activity. METHODS: Elite male hockey players (n = 12) completed a series of time trials (100 yards, 400 yards, 1500 yards) and a 3-min all-out test to derive both critical speed (CS) and critical power (CP). Heart rate (HR), blood lactate, and rating of perceived exertion were measured during each protocol. Participants (n = 10) then played two competitive hockey matches. Time spent greater than 85% of maximum HR was compared with time spent above CS (from the time trials) and CP (from the 3-min test). RESULTS: Between protocols, there was a moderate and nonsignificant association for CS (r = 0.359, P = 0.252) and a very large association for CP (r = 0.754, P = 0.005); the association was very large for peak HR (r = 0.866, P < 0.001), large for blood lactate (r = 0.506, P = 0.093), and moderate for rating of perceived exertion (rho = 0.441, P = 0.152). Time trials produced higher CS (4.3 vs 2.0 m·s, P < 0.001) and CP (18.3 vs 10.5 W·kg, P < 0.001) values than did the 3-min test. In matches, there was a very large association between time spent above 85% of maximum HR and time spent above both CS (r = 0.719, P < 0.001) and CP (r = 0.867, P < 0.001). This relationship was stronger for CP compared with CS (Z = 3.29, P = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: Speed is not an appropriate parameter for the classification of team sport activity comprising continual changes in speed and direction; however, critical metabolic power derived from variable-speed activity seems useful for this purpose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polglaze et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Elite male hockey players (n=12). Critical metabolic power (CP) vs. Critical speed (CS) was evaluated on Association between time spent >85% of maximum HR and time spent above CP or CS during matches (r = 0.867, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: