The present study was an attempt to chart the effects of two task design features, namely pre-task planning time and immediacy on written narrative performance.This is of pronounced importance since the synergistic effects of these two task features have gone largely unheeded in task-based research except for a smattering of studies (e.g., Gilabert, 2007).Accordingly, 123 participants were assigned to one of the 4 groups in the study, i.e., No planning & Here-and-Now, No planning & There-and-Then, Planning & Here-and-Now, and Planning & There-and-Then to write out a narrative task based on a series of pictures.The participants' output was coded and measured for grammatical accuracy, syntactic complexity, lexical complexity, and fluency.Results showed that only pre-task planning time significantly promoted grammatical accuracy albeit with a small effect size.Pre-task planners complexified their discourse more than no-planners.In addition, displacedness of time and space coupled with pre-task planning led to significantly higher gains in syntactic complexity.However, lexical complexity measures did not yield any significant results across the groups of participants.Finally, both provision of pre-task planning time and immediacy of time and space led to significantly more fluent production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farahani et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: