The skill of an automated statistical forecasting system that uses only hourly (top of the hour) surface observations is compared with a system that utilizes hourly and high-frequency (interhour) surface observations to forecast low-ceiling and low-visibility events in the New York City, New York, area. Forecasts feature lead times of 1 h and less. Equations to forecast ceiling and visibility conditions 1 h in advance are developed for initialization times at the top of the hour, as well as at 15, 30, and 45 min past the hour. Two forecasting systems are created: a baseline system that utilizes only hourly surface observations and an alternative system that utilizes both hourly surface observations and high-frequency observations. Introduction of the high-frequency observations into the forecasting system produces an additional 1.5%–4.5% reduction in the mean-square error (MSE), as compared with the baseline system for 1-h forecasts made at the top of the hour. By 45 min past the hour, the reduction in MSE over the baseline system increases to 14%–17%. The high-frequency observations are also utilized to develop forecast equations with lead times of 5–55 min. Reduction in MSE for this rapid-update forecasting system in comparison with simple persistence increased from an average of 3% for a 5-min lead time to an average of nearly 22% for a 55-min lead time. Moreover, improvements over persistence climatology increased from an average of 1.5% for a 5-min lead time to an average of about 14% for a 55-min lead time. These findings indicate that current observations-based forecasting techniques can be improved by utilizing high-frequency surface weather observations. Therefore, the uncertainty in decisions affected by the arrival and duration of a low ceiling and low visibility can be reduced, thereby providing enhanced guidance for operational airport traffic delay programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leyton et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: