“. . .though a Philosopher need not be sollicitous that his style should delight its Reader with his Floridnesse, yet I think he may very well be allow’d to take a Care that it disgust not his Reader by its Flatness, especially when he does not so much deliver Experiments or explicate them, as make Reflections or Discourses on them; for on such Occasions he may be allow’d the liberty of recreating his Reader and himself, and manifesting that he declin’d the Ornaments of Language, not out of Necessity, but Discretion. . .”—Robert Boyle, Proemial Essay [1].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weinberger et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: