Key result
Automated machine learning suppresses ~90% of false extreme tachycardia alarms while preserving true alarms.
Why the study?
High sensitivity of sensors in intensive care units causes significant false alarms leading to alarm fatigue and delayed medical response.
Can automated feature engineering and machine learning algorithms using arterial blood pressure signals accurately suppress false alarms in intensive care units?
Can automated feature engineering and machine learning algorithms using arterial blood pressure signals accurately suppress false alarms in intensive care units?
Machine learning algorithms using arterial blood pressure signals can effectively suppress ICU false alarms, potentially reducing alarm fatigue for medical personnel.
May reduce ICU alarm fatigue if validated; leaves open prospective trials before clinical adoption.
Patient monitoring in intensive care units requires collection and processing of high volumes of data. High sensitivity of sensors leads to significant number of false alarms, which cause alarm fatigue. Reduction of false alarms can lead to better reaction time of medical personnel. This paper aims to develop a method for false alarm suppression and evaluate it on a publicly available data set with manually annotated alarms. First, an automated feature engineering was performed using the signal for arterial blood pressure (ABP) and a processed signal that contained the times of each heartbeat from the ABP signal. Next, support vector machines, random forest, and extreme random trees classifiers were trained to create classification models. The best suppression performance was achieved for the extreme tachycardia alarm, for which 90.3% of the false alarms were suppressed, while only 0.54% of the true alarms were incorrectly suppressed. This paper demonstrates that alarm suppression can be achieved with high accuracy using an automated feature engineering coupled with machine learning algorithms. The proposed approach can be utilized as aid to medical personnel and experts, allowing them to be more productive and to respond to alarms in a more timely manner.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lameski et al. (2017) studied Intensive Care Unit False Alarms (n=7,531). Automated feature engineering and machine learning classifiers (Extremely Randomized Trees) was evaluated on False alarm suppression rate and true alarm suppression rate. An automated feature engineering approach coupled with extreme random trees classifiers suppressed 90.3% of false extreme tachycardia alarms while incorrectly suppressing only 0.54% of true alarms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: