Stepping—encompassing walking, running and stairclimbing—is the fundamental mode of human movement. Higher stepping volume and intensity is associated with favourable health outcomes. 2 Over the last quarter of the century, stepping has declined by over 1000 steps per day (7%–13% of total count, roughly equivalent to ~10 min of brisk walking). As a simple ‘objective’ measure of ambulatory physical activity, formal steppingbased recommendations may provide a target that is easy to understand and monitor. As selfmonitoring of steps may be an effective physical activity intervention, such recommendations may support more people to be sufficiently active. This editorial discusses the opportunities and challenges surrounding the addition of steppingbased recommendations to future guidelines. DAILY STEPS: AN OLD-NEW TARGET? Current physical activity recommendations are based on weekly duration (time) of moderate and vigorous activity (MVPA). For some people steps may be an easier to monitor and more concrete behavioural metric than time at a particular intensity. For example, step counting devices (pedometers, accelerometers or smartphones) have historically been more accessible than MVPA timequantifying devices. Simple mechanical pedometers first appeared almost 60 years ago around the Tokyo 1964 Olympics, with the Yamasa companydesigned ‘ManpoKei’ (‘10 000 steps metre’) being the first commercial step counter. The proliferation of stepcounting devices in the last 20 years saw the 10 000 daily steps target being treated as an unofficial goal that increasingly attracted public attention (online supplemental image 1).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stamatakis et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: