This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
What role, if any, physicians should have in the response to gun violence is a question not only of professionalism but also of law, culture, and ethics. We argue that physicians do have important roles to play in the larger landscape of advocacy, public opinion, and reduction of gun violence, but that it is not ethically or legally appropriate for them to serve as gatekeepers of gun privileges by assessing competency.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: