AIMS: Estimate the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with remote telemonitoring-enabled virtual diabetes educator visits for improving glycemic management in adults with type 2 diabetes, not on insulin. METHODS: Participants with type 2 diabetes, not on insulin, and HbA1c > 7.0 % were enrolled in an open-label randomized trial of 6 weeks of CGM with telemonitoring versus enhanced usual care. Both groups received educator visits. HbA1c was assessed at 12 weeks. RESULTS: Of 105 participants (mean age 57.3 years, 49.5 % females, mean baseline HbA1c 8.0 %), 86 remained at follow-up. Change in HbA1c was -0.69 % (CGM) versus -0.33 % (enhanced usual care). Adjusting for baseline HbA1c, CGM was superior (0.65 % greater HbA1c reduction [95 % CI 0.17-1.12 %], p = 0.008). CGM participants were 92 % (RR = 1.92, 1.19-3.06, p = 0.007) more likely to have an HbA1c reduction ≥ 0.5 %, lost more weight (difference in weight reduction 2.17 kg, 0.22-4.11, p = 0.029) and were more satisfied with their treatment. No treatment-related adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: CGM with virtual diabetes educator visits is effective, safe, and acceptable in adults with type 2 diabetes not on insulin and should be considered as an alternative to drug therapy for improving blood glucose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lau et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: