Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Using traditional methods to verify the existence of a fungal infection in children with suspected tinea capitis is a cumbersome process. Scraping scale and pulling hairs for culture or microscopic examination can be time-consuming and uncomfortable for the child. This study is the first comparison of this method with an alternate brush-culture method for diagnosing tinea capitis. In 70 children with symptoms suggestive of tinea capitis, there was strong agreement between methods in detecting disease or lack thereof (McNemar's test, P < .2). In the 51 paired positive cultures, those obtained by brush culture turned positive significantly faster (t test, P < .01) than samples obtained by the traditional method. The brush method is a reliable, painless, and more expedient way to obtain cultures from children with suspected tinea capitis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hubbard et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: