Why the study?
The effect of gender on outcomes after percutaneous mitral valve repair was not well known.
Does gender affect safety and efficacy outcomes after percutaneous mitral valve repair in patients with significant mitral regurgitation?
Observational (n=567)
Yes
Does gender affect safety and efficacy outcomes after percutaneous mitral valve repair in patients with significant mitral regurgitation?
Percutaneous mitral valve repair is equally safe and effective in women and men at 1 year, though women have higher rates of discharge to skilled nursing facilities.
Similar safety/efficacy and no survival difference by gender supports equitable MitraClip consideration; leaves open optimization of female discharge planning.
AIMS: Gender has been an important factor in outcomes after mitral valve surgery; however, its effect on percutaneous mitral valve repair is not well known. We aimed to report the effect of gender on outcomes in a large European prospective, multicentre, non-randomised post-approval study of percutaneous mitral valve repair. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and five female and 362 male patients with significant mitral regurgitation underwent percutaneous repair at 14 European sites from October 2008 to April 2011. Women and men had similar baseline risk scores, but women had a higher rate of degenerative disease (32% vs. 18%). Women were more likely to have one clip implanted (72% vs. 54%), but had a similar length of stay in the intensive care unit (2.6±4.1 days) and overall length of stay (8.0±6.9 days) compared to men. They were also less likely to be discharged home: more women than men went to skilled nursing facilities (25% vs. 15%) and fewer women went home compared to men (71.9% vs. 83.9%). Thirty-day and 12-month safety results were similar between genders, as was 12-month efficacy (echocardiographic and clinical). Multivariate analysis showed no effect of gender on 12-month survival. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world, post-approval experience in Europe, female patients who underwent percutaneous mitral valve repair experienced safety and efficacy results similar to those of males. However, the discharge rates to skilled nursing facilities rather than home may indicate a need for better optimisation of the female patient's physical and social comorbidities prior to intervention and during the hospitalisation period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gafoor et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Significant mitral regurgitation (n=567). Female gender vs. Male gender was evaluated on 30-day and 12-month safety, 12-month efficacy, and 12-month survival.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: