Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tetrakis[bis(trimethylsilyl)methyl]digallane(4) (1) with a Ga−Ga single bond and the corresponding diindane(4) 2 with an In−In single bond were treated with different protic reagents: tert-Butyl alcohol did not react with 1 at all, while phenol gave a mixture of unknown products, which could not be separated. The more acidic pentafluorophenol did not react as an acid, but C−F bonds were cleaved to form almost quantitatively the dimer (R2GaF)2 5, which was characterized by a crystal-structure determination. Water and 1 yielded the dimeric dialkylgallium hydroxide 6. The Ga−Ga bond was also cleaved by the reaction of 1 with durylthiophenol (duryl = 2,3,5,6-tetramethylphenyl), which gave two main products: R2Ga(SDuryl) 7 and RGa(SDuryl)2 8. In contrast, the chelating acid dibenzoylmethane reacted by means of a substituent exchange, with the release of two equiv. of bis(trimethylsilyl)methane for each formula unit of 1, to form 9, in which the Ga−Ga bond is retained and each chelating 1,3-diphenyl-1,3-propanedionato ligand is in a terminal position bonded to only one Ga atom, in more than 80% yield. The Ga−Ga bond is shortened [244.1(1) pm] compared to that in the starting compound tetraalkyldigallane(4) 1. The In−In bond of diindane(4) 2 is, however, cleaved in a similar reaction with dibenzoylmethane, and only the fragmentation product dialkyl(1,3-diphenyl-1,3-propanedionato)indium 10 could be isolated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uhl et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: