Key result
A 25-mg dose of M100240 produces similar pharmacokinetics in healthy young and elderly subjects.
Why the study?
The pharmacokinetics of the dual ACE/NEP inhibitor M100240 and its active form MDL 100,173 in young versus elderly healthy subjects were not characterized.
Does age affect the pharmacokinetics of a single 25-mg oral dose of the dual ACE/NEP inhibitor M100240 in healthy volunteers?
Does age affect the pharmacokinetics of a single 25-mg oral dose of the dual ACE/NEP inhibitor M100240 in healthy volunteers?
The pharmacokinetics of the active dual ACE/NEP inhibitor MDL 100,173 are not significantly affected by age, suggesting no need for age-based dose adjustments.
Supports similar exposure in healthy elderly; leaves open dosing needs in patients with comorbidities.
M100240 is an acetate thioester of MDL 100,173-a dual angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)/neutral endopeptidase (NEP) inhibitor-in phase II development. The pharmacokinetics of M100240 and MDL 100,173 were compared in young and elderly subjects. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 12 young (ages 18-45 years, 10 male, 2 female) and 12 elderly (ages 65-85 years, 7 male, 5 female) healthy subjects in a parallel-group, open-label study. Following an overnight fast, subjects received a single 25-mg oral dose of M100240. Serial plasma concentrations of M100240 and MDL 100,173 were determined using a validated liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with noncompartmental methods. Single-dose treatment with M100240 was well tolerated in both groups of subjects, with no clinically significant changes in vital signs, ECG recordings, or laboratory safety parameters. M100240 was rapidly absorbed and converted to MDL 100,173, with M100240 concentrations no longer detectable at 3 to 4 hours postdose in both groups. The pharmacokinetics of the pharmacologically active MDL 100,173 were similar for both groups. Although maximum concentrations of M100240 were generally higher in elderly versus young subjects (C(max) 0.48 ng/mL vs. 0.17 ng/mL), systemic availability of M100240 was quite low and variable with plasma, and this apparent difference in parent drug exposure is unlikely to have important clinical implications. No age-related differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters of MDL 100,173 (C(max) 8.16 vs. 9.62 ng/mL, t(max) 1.25 vs. 1.5 h, AUC((0-last)) 81.6 vs. 72.2 ng x h/mL) were observed between young and elderly subjects, respectively. In conclusion, there are no age-related differences in the pharmacokinetics of MDL 100,173 between young and elderly subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emmons et al. (2004) studied Healthy subjects (n=24). M100240 vs. Young subjects (age comparison) was evaluated on Pharmacokinetics of MDL 100,173 (Cmax, tmax, AUC). A single 25-mg oral dose of M100240 resulted in similar pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite MDL 100,173 in healthy young and elderly subjects, with no age-related differences observed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology