This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The integration of LED lighting enables precise radiation control in plant factory cultivation systems. While LEDs offer energy efficiency and spectral tuning, achieving a uniform photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) remains a critical technical challenge. This study evaluated the impact of three spatial LED configurations on irradiance uniformity using commercial horticultural LEDs and a light recipe of 75% red and 25% blue. Optical simulations in TracePro® 2017 were conducted to analyze radiant flux, optical efficiency, and uniformity, along with LED quantity, system cost, and electrical consumption under two environmental scenarios: open (without reflective walls) and closed (with reflective walls). Results show that distribution 3, which featured reduced central LED density, achieved 4–8% higher homogeneity in the open scenario, and 2.7–6.5% in the closed scenario, compared to symmetric layouts (distribution 1 and 2). Reflective walls increased average PPFD by up to 20% and optical efficiency by around 9%, with a minimal effect on uniformity. Lowering the lamp-to-canopy distance from 35 cm to 30 cm resulted in a 10% increase in PPFD. Despite a reduction in total photon flux, distribution 3 exhibited superior irradiance homogeneity. One-way ANOVA confirmed significant effects of environment, height, and LED model (p < 0.05), but not of spatial alone. This simulation-based methodology offers a robust framework for optimizing energy-efficient lighting systems. Future work will explore the integrating of non-visible wavelengths and experimental validations to extend practical applicability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romero-Lomeli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: