Key result
Carbon dioxide field flooding reduces worsening of early post-bypass wall motion abnormalities vs placebo.
Why the study?
Air embolization to the coronary arteries is a common cause of myocardial ischemia during open heart surgery, and carbon dioxide emboli may be absorbed faster than air emboli.
Does flooding the surgical field with carbon dioxide improve myocardial function in patients undergoing open heart valve surgery?
RCT (n=43)
Double-blind
Randomized
No
Does flooding the surgical field with carbon dioxide improve myocardial function in patients undergoing open heart valve surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.6% vs 1.95%
p-value: p=0.0266
Flooding the surgical field with carbon dioxide during open heart valve surgery reduces early postoperative worsening of myocardial wall motion.
Supports CO2 field flooding in valve surgery; provides RCT evidence and warrants clinical-outcome trials.
Air embolization to the coronary arteries is a common cause of myocardial ischemia during open heart surgery. Carbon dioxide emboli may be absorbed faster than air emboli. In this randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial, we determined that flooding the surgical field with carbon dioxide is associated with improved myocardial function assessed by transesophageal echocardiography. Forty-three valve surgeries were randomized to insufflation of 6 L/min of carbon dioxide or placebo through a Jackson Pratt drain into the pericardium during cardiopulmonary bypass. During rewarming, as pulse pressure rose above 10 mmHg, two observers graded severity of bubbles in the left heart. Two other observers evaluated wall motion in the transgastric midpapillary short axis view of the left ventricle using transesophageal echocardiography. Compared with baseline average scores among all walls (carbon dioxide, 1.42 +/- 0.46; placebo, 1.39 +/- 0.45), worsening of wall motion was less at 1 minute in the carbon dioxide (1.60 +/- 0.62) than in the placebo group (1.95 +/- 0.54; p = 0.0266). Better wall motion tended to persist in the carbon dioxide group at 10 (1.58 +/- 0.59 vs. 1.77 +/- 0.6) and 60 minutes (1.61 +/- 0.45 vs. 1.66 +/- 0.58). Particularly, the inferior wall tended toward transiently better function in the carbon dioxide group (at baseline and 1, 10, and 60 minutes: placebo, 1.62 +/- 0.72, 2.68 +/- 0.79, 2.48 +/- 0.95, 2.10 +/- 0.9 vs. 1.88 +/- 0.97, 2.33 +/- 1.1, 2.18 +/- 0.96, 2.20 +/- 0.94). Preoperative characteristics, length of bypass, anesthesia time, hospitalization, and intensive care unit stay were not different. We recommend administration of carbon dioxide because it may improve myocardial function. We describe how to avoid adverse effects of giving carbon dioxide by filtering the supply, continuously managing its level during bypass, increasing sweep speeds, continuously analyzing the in-line blood gas, and avoiding suctioning gases in the field into the cardiotomy reservoir.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skidmore et al. (2006) conducted an RCT in Elective open-heart surgery (n=43). Carbon dioxide field flooding vs. Placebo (medical grade air) was evaluated on Segmental wall motion abnormality (SWMA) score at 1 minute after separation from bypass (p=0.0266). Flooding the surgical field with carbon dioxide during open heart surgery significantly reduced the worsening of segmental wall motion abnormalities at 1 minute post-bypass compared to placebo.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: