Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The concept of multiple opioid receptors and multiple modes of interaction with a single receptor emanated from two convergent lines of research. This proposal was based originally on a detailed analysis of a wide spectrum of structure-activity relationships among analgesic ligands (1, 2). Very soon, pharmacological studies complemented and provided a more detailed framework for this concept (3-5). More recently, the multiple receptor concept has been advanced through a number of in vitro and in vivo biological assays and the opioid receptor binding assay. Data from such studies have been summarized in a number of reviews (6-13). Based on a wide range of pharmacological tests in the chronic spinal dog, Martin and coworkers (14, 15) suggested the designation 1-'-, K, or IT for those receptors at which morphine, ketazocine, and SKF 10,047 (N-allyl normetazocine) respectively are postulated to interact. The notion of different receptors for morphine-like and ketazocineor nalorphine-like compounds has been strengthened by the use of the pA2 concept (16) both in vitro (17-19) and in vivo (5) and by various other testing methods in vivo (20-22). The 8 and E receptor through which the enkephalins and l3-endorphin respectively are thought to mediate their effects have been identified in vitro (19,23,24). Thea receptor in vivo has been implicated in a number of physiological functions
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takemori et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: