Key result
Primary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the lung shows ~57% higher PET/CT SUVmax versus secondary lesions.
Why the study?
The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT combined with clinicopathological findings in differentiating primary from secondary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the lung was unclear.
Does 18F-FDG PET/CT help distinguish primary from secondary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the lung in patients with ACCL?
Cohort (n=40)
Does 18F-FDG PET/CT help distinguish primary from secondary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the lung in patients with ACCL?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.4% vs 2.8%
p-value: p=<0.05
18F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax is a useful non-invasive imaging parameter to differentiate primary from secondary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the lung.
SUVmax on 18F-FDG PET/CT may aid differentiation of PACCL from SACCL; leaves open need for prospective validation before routine adoption.
Background: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the lung (ACCL) is a rare malignancy and includes primary ACCL (PACCL) and secondary ACCL (SACCL) metastasized from the ACC of the head and neck. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) has been shown to be useful in the differential diagnosis between primary and metastatic lung lesions. This study retrospectively investigated the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in combination with clinicopathological findings in the management of patients with primary or secondary ACCL. Methods: Clinicopathological characteristics and 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters of 29 patients with PACCL and 11 patients with SACCL with pathological confirmation as gold standard were retrospectively collected. The association between PET/CT metabolic parameters and clinicopathological features was explored. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) cut-off value to distinguish PACCL from SACCL. The prognostic value of PET/CT metabolic parameters and clinicopathological features was evaluated by Cox regression analysis. Results: SACCL patients more often presented with multiple ACC lesions in the peripheral lung (81.8% vs. 17.2%, P<0.05) and tended to be asymptomatic compared to patients with PACCL (72.7% versus 27.6%, P<0.05). The SUVmax was significantly higher in PACCL patients compared to SACCL patients (median 4.4 vs. 2.8, P<0.05). Furthermore, at a cut-off value of 3.2 for SUVmax, the sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET/CT in distinguishing PACCL from SACCL were 82.8% and 72.7%, respectively. Higher SUVmax of ACCL was observed in patients with clinical symptoms, fewer ACC lesions, or larger tumor size (P<0.05). The median PFS of ACCL patients was 71.1 months, and the 12- and 24-month PFS rates were 96.1% and 91.6%, respectively. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that SACCL from metastasis, lesions located at the peripheral lung or multiple ACC lesions present in the lung, were associated with poorer PFS (P<0.05). However, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that none of the variables examined were independent predictors of prognosis. Conclusions: The use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in combination with assessment of clinicopathological features was helpful in distinguishing PACCL from SACCL, which could provide guidance for clinical decision making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the lung (ACCL) (n=40). Primary ACCL (PACCL) vs. Secondary ACCL (SACCL) was evaluated on Median SUVmax (p=<0.05). Primary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the lung exhibited a significantly higher median SUVmax on 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to secondary lesions (4.4 vs 2.8, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: